Affiliation:
1. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
2. Computer Science Department, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, USA
Abstract
Objective: Patient notes in electronic health records (EHRs) may contain critical information for medical investigations. However, the vast majority of medical investigators can only access de-identified notes, in order to protect the confidentiality of patients. In the United States, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) defines 18 types of protected health information that needs to be removed to de-identify patient notes. Manual de-identification is impractical given the size of electronic health record databases, the limited number of researchers with access to non-de-identified notes, and the frequent mistakes of human annotators. A reliable automated de-identification system would consequently be of high value.
Materials and Methods: We introduce the first de-identification system based on artificial neural networks (ANNs), which requires no handcrafted features or rules, unlike existing systems. We compare the performance of the system with state-of-the-art systems on two datasets: the i2b2 2014 de-identification challenge dataset, which is the largest publicly available de-identification dataset, and the MIMIC de-identification dataset, which we assembled and is twice as large as the i2b2 2014 dataset.
Results: Our ANN model outperforms the state-of-the-art systems. It yields an F1-score of 97.85 on the i2b2 2014 dataset, with a recall of 97.38 and a precision of 98.32, and an F1-score of 99.23 on the MIMIC de-identification dataset, with a recall of 99.25 and a precision of 99.21.
Conclusion: Our findings support the use of ANNs for de-identification of patient notes, as they show better performance than previously published systems while requiring no manual feature engineering.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference58 articles.
1. Some hospitals are falling behind in meeting “meaningful use” criteria and could be vulnerable to penalties in 2015;DesRoches;Health Affairs.,2013
2. Early results of the meaningful use program for electronic health records;Wright;New Engl J Med.,2013
3. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information;Office for Civil Rights H;Final rule. Federal Register.,2002
4. Automated de-identification of free-text medical records;Neamatullah;BMC Med Inform Decis Mak.,2008
5. De-identification algorithm for free-text nursing notes;Douglass;Comput Cardiol.,2005
Cited by
197 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献