Interruptive Electronic Alerts for Choosing Wisely Recommendations: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

Ho Vy T1ORCID,Aikens Rachael C2,Tso Geoffrey3,Heidenreich Paul A45,Sharp Christopher6,Asch Steven M35,Chen Jonathan H7,Shah Neil K8

Affiliation:

1. Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California, USA

2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California, USA

3. Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Stanford University School of Medicine , Palo Alto, California, USA

4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California, USA

5. Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto Healthcare System , Palo Alto, California, USA

6. Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California, USA

7. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University , Stanford, California, USA

8. Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine , Stanford, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy of interruptive electronic alerts in improving adherence to the American Board of Internal Medicine’s Choosing Wisely recommendations to reduce unnecessary laboratory testing. Materials and methods We administered 5 cluster randomized controlled trials simultaneously, using electronic medical record alerts regarding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing, acute sinusitis treatment, vitamin D testing, carotid artery ultrasound screening, and human papillomavirus testing. For each alert, we assigned 5 outpatient clinics to an interruptive alert and 5 were observed as a control. Primary and secondary outcomes were the number of postalert orders per 100 patients at each clinic and number of triggered alerts divided by orders, respectively. Post hoc analysis evaluated whether physicians experiencing interruptive alerts reduced their alert-triggering behaviors. Results Median postalert orders per 100 patients did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups; absolute median differences ranging from 0.04 to 0.40 for PSA testing. Median alerts per 100 orders did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups; absolute median differences ranged from 0.004 to 0.03. In post hoc analysis, providers receiving alerts regarding PSA testing in men were significantly less likely to trigger additional PSA alerts than those in the control sites (Incidence Rate Ratio 0.12, 95% CI [0.03–0.52]). Discussion Interruptive point-of-care alerts did not yield detectable changes in the overall rate of undesired orders or the order-to-alert ratio between active and silent sites. Complementary behavioral or educational interventions are likely needed to improve efforts to curb medical overuse. Conclusion Implementation of interruptive alerts at the time of ordering was not associated with improved adherence to 5 Choosing Wisely guidelines. Trial Registration NCT02709772

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference33 articles.

1. Excess medical care spending: the categories, magnitude, and opportunity costs of wasteful spending in the United States;Speer;Am J Public Health,2020

2. Precommitting to choose wisely about low-value services: a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial;Kullgren;BMJ Qual Saf,2018

3. Improving the appropriate use of transthoracic echocardiography: the echo WISELY trial;Bhatia;J Am Coll Cardiol,2017

4. The impact of choosing wisely interventions on low-value medical services: a systematic review;Cliff;Milbank Q

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reducing Care Overuse in Older Patients Using Professional Norms and Accountability;Annals of Internal Medicine;2024-03

2. Machine learning-based prediction of low-value care for hospitalized patients;Intelligence-Based Medicine;2023

3. From big data to better patient outcomes;Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM);2022-12-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3