Adherence to recommended electronic health record safety practices across eight health care organizations

Author:

Sittig Dean F1,Salimi Mandana2,Aiyagari Ranjit3,Banas Colin4,Clay Brian5,Gibson Kathryn A6,Goel Ashutosh7,Hines Robert8,Longhurst Christopher A5,Mishra Vimal4,Sirajuddin Anwar M9,Satterly Tyler1011,Singh Hardeep1011

Affiliation:

1. University of Texas/Memorial Hermann Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety, School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA

2. School of Biomedical Informatics, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, TX, USA

3. Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

4. Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

5. Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA

6. Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia

7. Bronson Healthcare Group, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Kalamazoo, MI, USA

8. Harris County Health System, Houston, TX, USA

9. Memorial Hermann Health System, Houston, TX, USA

10. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA

11. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective The Safety Assurance Factors for EHR Resilience (SAFER) guides were released in 2014 to help health systems conduct proactive risk assessment of electronic health record (EHR)- safety related policies, processes, procedures, and configurations. The extent to which SAFER recommendations are followed is unknown. Methods We conducted risk assessments of 8 organizations of varying size, complexity, EHR, and EHR adoption maturity. Each organization self-assessed adherence to all 140 unique SAFER recommendations contained within 9 guides (range 10–29 recommendations per guide). In each guide, recommendations were organized into 3 broad domains: “safe health IT” (total 45 recommendations); “using health IT safely” (total 80 recommendations); and “monitoring health IT” (total 15 recommendations). Results The 8 sites fully implemented 25 of 140 (18%) SAFER recommendations. Mean number of “fully implemented” recommendations per guide ranged from 94% (System Interfaces—18 recommendations) to 63% (Clinical Communication—12 recommendations). Adherence was higher for “safe health IT” domain (82.1%) vs “using health IT safely” (72.5%) and “monitoring health IT” (67.3%). Conclusions Despite availability of recommendations on how to improve use of EHRs, most recommendations were not fully implemented. New national policy initiatives are needed to stimulate implementation of these best practices.

Funder

Agency for Health Care Research and Quality

VA Health Services Research and Development Service

VA National Center for Patient Safety

HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3