Sticky apps, not sticky hands: A systematic review and content synthesis of hand hygiene mobile apps

Author:

Gasteiger Norina123ORCID,Dowding Dawn1ORCID,Ali Syed Mustafa245,Scott Ashley Jordan Stephen16ORCID,Wilson Paul3,van der Veer Sabine N27ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

2. Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, Centre for Health Informatics, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

3. Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

4. Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

5. NIHR Manchester Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

6. Division of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, United Kingdom

7. Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

Abstract

Abstract Objective The study sought to identify smartphone apps that support hand hygiene practice and to assess their content, technical and functional features, and quality. A secondary objective was to make design and research recommendations for future apps. Materials and Methods We searched the UK Google Play and Apple App stores for hand hygiene smartphone apps aimed at adults. Information regarding content, technical and functional features was extracted and summarized. Two raters evaluated each app, using the IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics functionality score and the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS). Results A total of 668 apps were identified, with 90 meeting the inclusion criteria. Most (96%) were free to download. The majority (78%) intended to educate or inform or remind users to hand wash (69%), using behavior change techniques such as personalization and prompting practice. Only 20% and 4% named a best practice guideline or had expert involvement in development, respectively. Innovative means of engagement were used in 42% (eg, virtual or augmented reality or geolocation-based reminders). Apps included an average of 2.4 out of 10 of the IMS functionality criteria (range, 0-8). The mean MARS score was 3.2 ± 0.5 out of 5, and 68% had a minimum acceptability score of 3. Two had been tested or trialed. Conclusions Although many hand hygiene apps exist, few provide content on best practice. Many did not meet the minimum acceptability criterion for quality or were formally trialed or tested. Research should assess the feasibility and effectiveness of hand hygiene apps (especially within healthcare settings), including when and how they “work.” We recommend that future apps to support hand hygiene practice are developed with infection prevention and control experts and align with best practice. Robust research is needed to determine which innovative methods of engagement create “sticky” apps.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration

the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference63 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3