International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons

Author:

Zelmer Jennifer12,Ronchi Elettra3,Hyppönen Hannele4,Lupiáñez-Villanueva Francisco5,Codagnone Cristiano56,Nøhr Christian7,Huebner Ursula8,Fazzalari Anne9,Adler-Milstein Julia10

Affiliation:

1. Azimuth Health Group, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. School of Health Information Science, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada

3. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France

4. Information services department, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland

5. Information and Communication Department, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Spain

6. Dipartimento di Scienze Sociali e Politiche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy

7. Danish Centre for Health Informatics, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

8. Health Informatics Research Group, Hochschule Osnabrueck, Osnabrueck, Germany

9. Canada Health Infoway, Toronto, Canada

10. University of Michigan School of Information, Ann Arbor, United States

Abstract

Objective: To pilot benchmark measures of health information and communication technology (ICT) availability and use to facilitate cross-country learning. Materials and Methods: A prior Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development–led effort involving 30 countries selected and defined functionality-based measures for availability and use of electronic health records, health information exchange, personal health records, and telehealth. In this pilot, an Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Working Group compiled results for 38 countries for a subset of measures with broad coverage using new and/or adapted country-specific or multinational surveys and other sources from 2012 to 2015. We also synthesized country learnings to inform future benchmarking. Results: While electronic records are widely used to store and manage patient information at the point of care—all but 2 pilot countries reported use by at least half of primary care physicians; many had rates above 75%—patient information exchange across organizations/settings is less common. Large variations in the availability and use of telehealth and personal health records also exist. Discussion: Pilot participation demonstrated interest in cross-national benchmarking. Using the most comparable measures available to date, it showed substantial diversity in health ICT availability and use in all domains. The project also identified methodological considerations (e.g., structural and health systems issues that can affect measurement) important for future comparisons. Conclusion: While health policies and priorities differ, many nations aim to increase access, quality, and/or efficiency of care through effective ICT use. By identifying variations and describing key contextual factors, benchmarking offers the potential to facilitate cross-national learning and accelerate the progress of individual countries.

Funder

Canada Health Infoway, the European Commission, the Office of the National Coordinator in the United States, and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Reference26 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3