Accuracy of the medication list in the electronic health record—implications for care, research, and improvement

Author:

Walsh Kathleen E1,Marsolo Keith A2,Davis Cori3,Todd Theresa4,Martineau Bernadette5,Arbaugh Carlie6,Verly Frederique6,Samson Charles7,Margolis Peter1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

2. Department of Biomedical Informatics and Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

4. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Gastroenterology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA

5. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Specialty Services, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA

6. Department of Pediatrics, Program for Patient Safety and Quality, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

7. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective Electronic medication lists may be useful in clinical decision support and research, but their accuracy is not well described. Our aim was to assess the completeness of the medication list compared to the clinical narrative in the electronic health record. Methods We reviewed charts of 30 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from each of 6 gastroenterology centers. Centers compared IBD medications from the medication list to the clinical narrative. Results We reviewed 379 IBD medications among 180 patients. There was variation by center, from 90% patients with complete agreement between the medication list and clinical narrative to 50% agreement. Conclusions There was a range in the accuracy of the medication list compared to the clinical narrative. This information may be helpful for sites seeking to improve data quality and those seeking to use medication list data for research or clinical decision support.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

ImproveCareNow Network

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3