Evaluation framework for conversational agents with artificial intelligence in health interventions: a systematic scoping review

Author:

Ding Hang12,Simmich Joshua12,Vaezipour Atiyeh12,Andrews Nicole1234,Russell Trevor12

Affiliation:

1. RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD, Australia

2. STARS Education and Research Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS), The University of Queensland and Metro North Health , Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3. The Tess Cramond Pain and Research Centre, Metro North Hospital and Health Service , Brisbane, QLD, Australia

4. The Occupational Therapy Department, The Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service , Brisbane, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Conversational agents (CAs) with emerging artificial intelligence present new opportunities to assist in health interventions but are difficult to evaluate, deterring their applications in the real world. We aimed to synthesize existing evidence and knowledge and outline an evaluation framework for CA interventions. Materials and Methods We conducted a systematic scoping review to investigate designs and outcome measures used in the studies that evaluated CAs for health interventions. We then nested the results into an overarching digital health framework proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Results The review included 81 studies evaluating CAs in experimental (n = 59), observational (n = 15) trials, and other research designs (n = 7). Most studies (n = 72, 89%) were published in the past 5 years. The proposed CA-evaluation framework includes 4 evaluation stages: (1) feasibility/usability, (2) efficacy, (3) effectiveness, and (4) implementation, aligning with WHO’s stepwise evaluation strategy. Across these stages, this article presents the essential evidence of different study designs (n = 8), sample sizes, and main evaluation categories (n = 7) with subcategories (n = 40). The main evaluation categories included (1) functionality, (2) safety and information quality, (3) user experience, (4) clinical and health outcomes, (5) costs and cost benefits, (6) usage, adherence, and uptake, and (7) user characteristics for implementation research. Furthermore, the framework highlighted the essential evaluation areas (potential primary outcomes) and gaps across the evaluation stages. Discussion and Conclusion This review presents a new framework with practical design details to support the evaluation of CA interventions in healthcare research. Protocol registration The Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/9hq2v) on March 22, 2021.

Funder

University of Queensland

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3