Perspectives on the role of industry in informatics research and authorship

Author:

Strasberg Howard R1ORCID,Jackson Gretchen Purcell23ORCID,Bakken Suzanne R4ORCID,Boxwala Aziz5ORCID,Richardson Joshua E6ORCID,Morrow Jon D7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Effectiveness, Wolters Kluwer Health , Waltham, MA 02451, United States

2. Intuitive Surgical , Sunnyvale, CA 94086, United States

3. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, TN 37232, United States

4. School of Nursing, Department of Biomedical Informatics, and Data Science Institute, Columbia University , New York, NY 10032, United States

5. Elimu Informatics , La Jolla, CA 92037, United States

6. Center for Informatics, RTI International , Berkeley, CA 94704, United States

7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University School of Medicine , New York, NY 10016, United States

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Advances in informatics research come from academic, nonprofit, and for-profit industry organizations, and from academic-industry partnerships. While scientific studies of commercial products may offer critical lessons for the field, manuscripts authored by industry scientists are sometimes categorically rejected. We review historical context, community perceptions, and guidelines on informatics authorship. Process We convened an expert panel at the American Medical Informatics Association 2022 Annual Symposium to explore the role of industry in informatics research and authorship with community input. The panel summarized session themes and prepared recommendations. Conclusions Authorship for informatics research, regardless of affiliation, should be determined by International Committee of Medical Journal Editors uniform requirements for authorship. All authors meeting criteria should be included, and categorical rejection based on author affiliation is unethical. Informatics research should be evaluated based on its scientific rigor; all sources of bias and conflicts of interest should be addressed through disclosure and, when possible, methodological mitigation.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3