2018 n2c2 shared task on adverse drug events and medication extraction in electronic health records

Author:

Henry Sam1ORCID,Buchan Kevin2,Filannino Michele13,Stubbs Amber4,Uzuner Ozlem135

Affiliation:

1. Department is Information Sciences and Technology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA

2. Department of Information Science, University at Albany – State University of New York, Albany, New York, USA

3. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

4. Department is Mathematics and Computer Science, Simmons University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

5. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective This article summarizes the preparation, organization, evaluation, and results of Track 2 of the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges shared task. Track 2 focused on extraction of adverse drug events (ADEs) from clinical records and evaluated 3 tasks: concept extraction, relation classification, and end-to-end systems. We perform an analysis of the results to identify the state of the art in these tasks, learn from it, and build on it. Materials and Methods For all tasks, teams were given raw text of narrative discharge summaries, and in all the tasks, participants proposed deep learning–based methods with hand-designed features. In the concept extraction task, participants used sequence labelling models (bidirectional long short-term memory being the most popular), whereas in the relation classification task, they also experimented with instance-based classifiers (namely support vector machines and rules). Ensemble methods were also popular. Results A total of 28 teams participated in task 1, with 21 teams in tasks 2 and 3. The best performing systems set a high performance bar with F1 scores of 0.9418 for concept extraction, 0.9630 for relation classification, and 0.8905 for end-to-end. However, the results were much lower for concepts and relations of Reasons and ADEs. These were often missed because local context is insufficient to identify them. Conclusions This challenge shows that clinical concept extraction and relation classification systems have a high performance for many concept types, but significant improvement is still required for ADEs and Reasons. Incorporating the larger context or outside knowledge will likely improve the performance of future systems.

Funder

National Library of Medicine of the National Institutes of Health

NIH

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 176 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. MKG-GC: A multi-task learning-based knowledge graph construction framework with personalized application to gastric cancer;Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal;2024-12

2. From zero to hero: Harnessing transformers for biomedical named entity recognition in zero- and few-shot contexts;Artificial Intelligence in Medicine;2024-10

3. CACER: Clinical concept Annotations for Cancer Events and Relations;Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association;2024-09-03

4. Extraction of entity relationships serving the field of agriculture food safety regulation;International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics;2024-08-21

5. Pre-trained language models in medicine: A survey;Artificial Intelligence in Medicine;2024-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3