Letter to the Editor in response to “Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review”-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Letter to the Editor in response to “Online physician ratings fail to predict actual performance on measures of quality, value, and peer review”

Published:2017-12-11 Issue:6 Volume:25 Page:744-745
ISSN:1067-5027
Container-title:Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Bardach Naomi S¹

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Health Policy, University of California San Francisco, Department of Pediatrics, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA, USA

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Link

http://academic.oup.com/jamia/article-pdf/25/6/744/34150826/ocx143.pdf

Reference4 articles.

1. Availability of consumer prices from Philadelphia area hospitals for common services: electrocardiograms vs parking;Bernstein;JAMA Int Med.,2014

2. Availability of consumer prices from US hospitals for a common surgical procedure;Rosenthal;JAMA Int Med.,2013

3. The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA;Bardach;BMJ Qual Safety,2013

4. Associations between web-based patient ratings and objective measures of hospital quality;Greaves;Arch Intern Med.,2012

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Are Online Patient Reviews Associated With Health Care Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Literature;Medical Care Research and Review;2021-05-24

2. Online Reviews of Credence Service Providers: What Do Consumers Evaluate, Do Other Consumers Believe the Reviews, and Are Interventions Needed?;Journal of Public Policy & Marketing;2020-10-08

3. Exploring the impact of review valence, disease risk, and trust on patient choice based on online physician reviews;Telematics and Informatics;2019-12