Evolving assessment pathways for precision oncology medicines to improve patient access: a tumor-agnostic lens

Author:

Radu Priscila1ORCID,Kumar Gayathri1,Cole Amanda1,Fameli Aikaterini2,Guthrie Mark3,Annemans Lieven4ORCID,Geissler Jan5,Italiano Antoine6,O’Rourke Brian7,Xoxi Entela8,Steuten Lotte1

Affiliation:

1. Office of Health Economics , London , United Kingdom

2. Global Oncology Policy, GSK , London , United Kingdom

3. Global Access Strategy Oncology, Roche , San Francisco, CA , United States

4. Department of Health Economics, Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium

5. Patvocates , Munich , Germany

6. Early Phase Trials and Sarcoma Units, Institut Bergonié , Bordeaux , France

7. ISPOR , Ottawa , Canada

8. Faculty of Economics, ALTEMS Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy

Abstract

Abstract Background Genomic and molecular alterations are increasingly important in cancer diagnosis, and scientific advances are opening new treatment avenues. Precision oncology (PO) uses a patient’s genomic profile to determine optimal treatment, promising fewer side effects and higher success rates. Within PO, tumor-agnostic (TA) therapies target genomic alterations irrespective of tumor location. However, traditional value frameworks and approval pathways pose challenges which may limit patient access to PO therapies. Objectives This study describes challenges in assessing PO and TA medicines, explores possible solutions, and provides actionable recommendations to facilitate an iterative life-cycle assessment of these medicines. Methods After reviewing the published literature, we obtained insights from key stakeholders and European experts across a range of disciplines, through individual interviews and an industry workshop. The research was guided and refined by an international expert committee through 2 sounding board meetings. Results The current challenges faced by PO and TA medicines are multiple and can be demonstrated through real-world examples of the current barriers and opportunities. A life-cycle approach to assessment should be taken, including key actions at the early stages of evidence generation, regulatory and reimbursement stage, as well as payment and adoption solutions that make use of the evolving evidence base. Working toward these solutions to maximize PO medicine value is a shared responsibility and stands to benefit all stakeholders. Conclusions Our call to action is to expand access to comprehensive genomic testing, foster a learning health care system, enable fast and equitable access to cost-effective treatments, and ultimately improve health outcomes.

Funder

European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference44 articles.

1. A perspective on life-cycle health technology assessment and real-world evidence for precision oncology in Canada;Regier,2022

2. Towards a responsible transition to learning healthcare systems in precision medicine: ethical points to consider;Wouters,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3