Physician Perspectives on Reducing Curative Cancer Treatment Intensity for Populations Underrepresented in Clinical Trials

Author:

Rocque Gabrielle B123ORCID,Andrews Courtney4,Lawhon Valerie M1,Ingram Stacey A1,Frazier Rachel M1,Smith Mary Lou5,Wagner Lynne I6,Zubkoff Lisa378,Wallner Lauren P9,Wolff Antonio C10

Affiliation:

1. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL , USA

2. Division of Gerontology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL , USA

3. O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center , Birmingham, AL , USA

4. Institute for Human Rights, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL , USA

5. Research Advocacy Network , Plano, TX , USA

6. Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston Salem, NC , USA

7. Division of Preventive Medicine, , Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL , USA

8. Birmingham/Atlanta Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Birmingham VA Healthcare System , Birmingham, AL , USA

9. Rogel Cancer Center, Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI , USA

10. The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Historically, clinical trials involved adding novel agents to standard of care to improve survival. There has been a shift to an individualized approach with testing less intense treatment, particularly in breast cancer where risk of recurrence is low. Little is known about physician perspectives on delivering less intense treatment for patients who are not well represented in clinical trials. Methods Open-ended, individual qualitative interviews with medical oncologists explored their perspectives on trials that test less intense treatment for patients with cancer, with a focus on breast cancer. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. Four independent coders utilized a content analysis approach to analyze transcripts using NVivo. Major themes and exemplary quotes were extracted. Results Of the 39 participating physicians, 61.5% felt comfortable extrapolating, 30.8% were hesitant, and 7.7% would not feel comfortable extrapolating trial outcomes to underrepresented populations. Facilitators of comfort included the sentiment that “biology is biology” (such that the cancer characteristics were what mattered), the strength of the evidence, inclusion of subset analysis on underrepresented populations, and prior experience making decisions with limited data. Barriers to extrapolation included potential harm over the patient’s lifetime, concerns about groups that had minimal participants, application to younger patients, and extending findings to diverse populations. Universally, broader inclusion in trials testing lowering chemotherapy was desired. Conclusions The majority (92%) of physicians reported that they would de-implement treatment for patients poorly represented in clinical trials testing less treatment, while expressing concerns about applicability to specific subpopulations. Further work is needed to increase clinical trial representation of diverse populations to safely and effectively optimize treatment for patients with cancer. Trial registration NCT03248258

Funder

Johns Hopkins University

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3