The Perceived Usability of Virtual Visits Among Black Adults’ Receiving Oncology Care: A Qualitative Analysis

Author:

Tam Samantha123ORCID,Neslund-Dudas Christine14,Barrett Amy M5,Barrow Lauren C J56,Fridman Ilona7,Kinlaw Alan C58,Puviindran Praveen5,Royce Trevor J9,Smith Angela B710,Stein Jacob N1011,Wood William A1011,Elston Lafata Jennifer57ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health , Detroit, MI , USA

2. Department of Otolaryngology, Henry Ford Health , Detroit, MI , USA

3. Department of Surgery, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI , USA

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University , East Lansing, MI , USA

5. University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

6. Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD , USA

7. University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

8. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

9. Department of Radiation, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC , USA

10. Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

11. Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, NC , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background With the COVID-19 pandemic came rapid uptake in virtual oncology care. During this, sociodemographic inequities in access to virtual visits (VVs) have become apparent. To better understand these issues, we conducted a qualitative study to describe the perceived usability and acceptability of VVs among Black adults diagnosed with cancer. Methods Adults who self-identified as Black and had a diagnosis of prostate, multiple myeloma, or head and neck cancer were recruited from 2 academic medical centers, and their community affiliates to participate in a semi-structured interview, regardless of prior VV experience. A patient and family advisory board was formed to inform all components of the study. Interviews were conducted between September 2, 2021 and February 23, 2022. Transcripts were organized topically, and themes and subthemes were determined through iterative and interpretive immersion/crystallization cycles. Results Of the 49 adults interviewed, 29 (59%) had participated in at least one VV. Three overarching themes were derived: (1) VVs felt comfortable and convenient in the right contexts; (2) the technology required for VVs with video presented new challenges, which were often resolved by an audio-only telephone call; and (3) participants reported preferring in-person visits, citing concerns regarding gaps in nonverbal communication, trusting providers, and distractions during VV. Conclusion While VVs were reported to be acceptable in specific circumstances, Black adults reported preferring in-person care, in part due to a perceived lack of interpersonal connectedness. Nonetheless, retaining reimbursement for audio-only options for VVs is essential to ensure equitable access for those with less technology savvy and/or limited device/internet capabilities.

Funder

Genentech Health Equity & Diversity

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference41 articles.

1. Both sides of the screen: provider and patient perspective on telemedicine in pediatric surgery;Knaus,2022

2. Patient and physician attitudes toward telemedicine in cancer clinics following the COVID-19 pandemic;Wehrle,2021

3. Virtual visits in oncology: enhancing care quality while designing for equity;Lafata,2021

4. Patient perspectives of telemedicine in gynecologic oncology during COVID;Nestlerode,2022

5. Assessing telemedicine unreadiness among older adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic;Lam,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3