Commercial Versus Medicaid Insurance and Use of High-Priced Anticancer Treatments

Author:

Mitchell Aaron P123ORCID,Kinlaw Alan C34,Peacock-Hinton Sharon5,Dusetzina Stacie B67,Winn Aaron N8,Sanoff Hanna K910,Lund Jennifer L510

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY , United States

2. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center , New York, NY , United States

3. Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , United States

4. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , United States

5. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , United States

6. Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine , Nashville, TN , United States

7. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center , Nashville, TN , United States

8. University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, IL , United States

9. Department of Hematology/ Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , United States

10. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC , United States

Abstract

Abstract Background Because the markups on cancer drugs vary by payor, providers’ financial incentive to use high-price drugs is differential according to each patient’s insurance type. We evaluated the association between patient insurer (commercial vs Medicaid) and the use of high-priced cancer treatments. Materials and Methods We linked cancer registry, administrative claims, and demographic data for individuals diagnosed with cancer in North Carolina from 2004 to 2011, with either commercial or Medicaid insurance. We selected cancers with multiple FDA-approved, guideline-recommended chemotherapy options and large price differences between treatment options: advanced colorectal, lung, and head and neck cancer. The outcome was a receipt of a higher-priced option, and the exposure was insurer: commercial versus Medicaid. We estimated risk ratios (RRs) for the association between insurer and higher-priced treatment using log-binomial models with inverse probability of exposure weights. Results Of 812 patients, 209 (26%) had Medicaid. The unadjusted risk of receiving higher-priced treatment was 36% (215/603) for commercially insured and 27% (57/209) for Medicaid insured (RR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.02-1.67). After adjustment for confounders the association was attenuated (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.81-1.65). Exploratory subgroup analysis suggested that commercial insurance was associated with increased receipt of higher-priced treatment among patients treated by non-NCI-designated providers (RR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.14-2.04). Conclusions Individuals with Medicaid and commercial insurance received high-priced treatments in similar proportion, after accounting for differences in case mix. However, modification by provider characteristics suggests that insurance type may influence treatment selection for some patient groups. Further work is needed to determine the relationship between insurance status and newer, high-price drugs such as immune-oncology agents.

Funder

Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference36 articles.

1. Payment for oncolytics in the United States: a history of buy and bill and proposals for reform;Polite,2014

2. Reform of the buy-and-bill system for outpatient chemotherapy care is inevitable: perspectives from an economist, a realpolitik, and an oncologist;Polite,2015

3. For uninsured cancer patients, outpatient charges can be costly, putting treatments out of reach;Dusetzina,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3