Breast Cancer-Related Financial Toxicity in Sri Lanka: Insights From a Lower Middle-Income Country With Free Universal Public Healthcare

Author:

Ranawaka Sarith1ORCID,Gunarathna Sathika1,Gunasekera Sanjeeva2,Booth Christopher M34,Jalink Matthew45,Carson Laura M4,Berry Scott3,Gyawali Bishal34ORCID,Seneviratne Sanjeewa1ORCID,Wijeratne Don Thiwanka46

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo , Colombo , Sri Lanka

2. National Cancer Institute , Maharagama , Sri Lanka

3. Department of Oncology, Queen’s University , Kingston, Ontario , Canada

4. Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen’s University Cancer Research Institute , Kingston, Ontario , Canada

5. Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen’s University , Kingston, Ontario , Canada

6. Department of Medicine, Queen’s University , Kingston, Ontario , Canada

Abstract

Abstract Financial toxicity (FT) describes either objective or perceived excess financial strain due to a cancer diagnosis on the well-being of patients, families, and society. The consequences of FT have been shown to span countries of varied economic tiers and diverse healthcare models. This study attempts to describe FT and its effects in a lower- to middle-income country delivering predominantly public nonfee-levying healthcare. This was a cross-sectional study involving 210 patients with breast cancer of any stage (I to IV), interviewed between 6 and 18 months from the date of diagnosis. Financial toxicity was highly prevalent with 81% reporting 3 or more on a scale of 1 to 5. Costs incurred for travelling (94%), out-of-hospital investigations (87%), and consultation fees outside the public system (81%) were the most common contributors to FT. Daily compromises for food and education were made by 30% and 20%, respectively, with loss of work seen in over one-third. Greater FT was seen with advanced cancer stage and increasing distance to the nearest radiotherapy unit (P = .008 and .01, respectively). Family and relatives were the most common form of financial support (77.6%). In conclusion, FT is substantial in our group, with many having to make daily compromises for basic needs. Many opt to visit the fee-levying private sector for at least some part of their care, despite the availability of an established public nonfee-levying healthcare.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference24 articles.

1. Financial toxicity in cancer care: prevalence, causes, consequences, and reduction strategies;Lentz,2019

2. A systematic review of financial toxicity among cancer survivors: we can’t pay the co-pay;Gordon,2017

3. Financial toxicity among women with metastatic breast cancer;Rosenzweig;Oncol Nurs Forum,2019

4. Financial toxicity of cancer treatment: moving the discussion from acknowledgement of the problem to identifying solutions;Desai,2020

5. Measuring financial toxicity as a clinically relevant patient-reported outcome: the validation of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST);Souza;Cancer,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3