Affiliation:
1. GRASIA Research Group, Institute of Knowledge Technology, Complutense University of Madrid , Madrid, Spain
2. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society, Harvard University , Cambridge, MA, USA
Abstract
Abstract
Blockchain technology enables new kinds of decentralized systems. Thus, it has often been advocated as a “disruptive” technology that could have the potentiality of reshaping political, economic, and social relations, “solving” problems like corruption, power centralization, and distrust toward political institutions. Blockchain has been gradually gaining attention beyond finance and is thus applied by a range of different actors. This includes local, regional, and national governments interested in the potentiality of experimenting with blockchain-supported governance. This article contributes to identifying blockchain as a contested socio-political object prone to contradictory political imaginaries regarding its potentialities, particularly when applied to policy. The article explores some of the most praised of blockchain’s affordances (e.g., decentralization and transparency) in the context of Estonia, one of the most cited examples of blockchain governmental applications. Estonia has received international attention as the alleged first national infrastructure integrating blockchain. However, so far, few have asked: what kind of blockchain-based tools have been built by the Estonian government in practice and why? And to what extent do blockchain-based governmental applications reflect the original promises of disruption of the crypto-community? This article draws on a qualitative approach to explore several blockchain-based socio-technical objects to identify the narratives that have emerged in Estonia. The research shows clear contrasting views between stakeholders and technical experts from inside and outside the institutional sphere. The conflict revolves around two different social imaginaries associated with permissioned vs. public blockchains. The paper concludes with an analysis of the profound political implications of each vision.
Funder
european research council erc-2017-stg
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference73 articles.
1. A systematic analysis of applications of blockchain in healthcare;Agarwal,2021
2. Blockchain (distributed ledger technology) solves VAT fraud;Ainsworth;SSRN Electronic Journal,2016
3. How blockchain technology changes government;Alexopoulos;International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age,2021
4. Discovering and developing the blockchain cryptoeconomy;Allen,2017
5. Reflections: Ethnographic content analysis;Altheide;Qualitative Sociology,1987
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献