The alegality of blockchain technology

Author:

De Filippi Primavera12ORCID,Mannan Morshed34ORCID,Reijers Wessel567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Chargée de recherche , CERSA | CNRS, Paris, France

2. Faculty Associate, Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society , Harvard University, Cambridge MA, USA

3. Max Weber Fellow, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies , European University Institute, Florence, Italy

4. ICDE Research Affiliate , The New School, NY, USA

5. Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Vienna , Vienna, Austria

6. Visiting Fellow, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies , European University Institute, Florence, Italy

7. Visiting Scholar , Technion, Haifa, Israel

Abstract

Abstract Similar to the early days of the Internet, today, the effectiveness and applicability of legal regulations are being challenged by the advent of blockchain technology. Yet, unlike the Internet, which has evolved into an increasingly centralized system that was largely brought within the reach of the law, blockchain technology still resists regulation and is thus described by some as being “alegal”, i.e., situated beyond the boundaries of existing legal orders and, therefore, challenging them. This article investigates whether blockchain technology can indeed be qualified as alegal and the extent to which such technology can be brought back within the boundaries of a legal order by means of targeted policies. First, the article explores the features of blockchain-based systems, which make them hard to regulate, mainly due to their approach to disintermediation. Second, drawing from the notion of alegality in legal philosophy, the article analyzes how blockchain technology enables acts that transgress the temporal, spatial, material, and subjective boundaries of the law, thereby introducing the notion of “alegality by design”—as the design of a technological artifact can provide affordances for alegality. Third, the article discusses how the law could respond to the alegality of blockchain technology through innovative policies encouraging the use of regulatory sandboxes to test for the “functional equivalence” and “regulatory equivalence” of the practices and processes implemented by blockchain initiatives.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference68 articles.

1. El Salvador becomes first nation to bitcoin legal tender;Associated Press,2021

2. Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary?;Atzori,2015

3. Corporate Sovereignty

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Asset, Token, or Coin? A Semiotic Analysis of Blockchain Language;International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique;2024-01

2. METAVERSE: MODEL CRIMINAL CODE;Baltic Journal of Economic Studies;2023-11-17

3. Enablers of blockchain adoption on supply chain with dynamic capability perspectives with ISM-MICMAC analysis;Annals of Operations Research;2023-11-16

4. Blockchain in Banking: A Bibliometric Review;2023 9th International Conference on Smart Computing and Communications (ICSCC);2023-08-17

5. “Blockchain in government: toward an evaluation framework”;Policy Design and Practice;2023-07-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3