The World Health Organization as an engine of ideational robustness

Author:

Denis Jean-Louis1ORCID,Foucault Gaëlle2,Larouche Pierre2,Régis Catherine2,Cohen Miriam2,Girard Marie-Andrée3

Affiliation:

1. School of Public Health, Université de Montréal , 7101 Av du Parc, Montréal, Québec H3N1X9, Canada

2. Faculty of Law, Université de Montréal , Montréal, Canada

3. Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal , Montréal, Canada

Abstract

Abstract The paper focuses on the role of the World Health Organization (WHO) in promoting a healthy world population as a generative and robust idea within health policy. The WHO’s health credo transcends national boundaries to promote health globally. It is embedded in norms, values, and standards promulgated by the organization and contributes in shaping the health responses of national governments. Ideational robustness refers to the ability of the WHO to adapt its health credo to changing contexts and circumstances, thus promoting the legitimacy of an international health order. Disturbances, including the Covid-19 pandemic, test the credo’s robustness, forcing the WHO to constantly work at reframing ideas to adapt to political forces and competing logics that structure the field of international health. Empirically, the paper is based on an historical analysis of the evolution of the health credo of the WHO since its inception. Qualitative content analysis of secondary sources, such as policy documents, explores how ideational work performed by WHO leaders impacts on the organization’s position and legitimacy. Ideational robustness appears to be largely influenced by leadership vision, preexisting organizational structure, and the political economy of international health. Ideational robustness appears as a powerful yet insufficient ingredient of policy success.

Funder

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference102 articles.

1. The chronicle of a disease foretold: Pandemic H1N1 and the construction of a global health security threat;Abraham;Political Studies,2011

2. The paradox of organizing states: A meta-organization perspective on international organizations;Ahrne;Journal of International Organizations Studies,2016

3. Public administration and politics meet turbulence: The search for robust governance responses;Ansell;Public Administration,2023

4. Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective;Béland;Social Policy & Administration,2005

5. Ideas, institutions, and policy change;Béland;Journal of European Public Policy,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3