Health reforms and policy capacity: the Canadian experience

Author:

Denis Jean-Louis1ORCID,Usher Susan2ORCID,Préval Johanne3

Affiliation:

1. Département de gestion, d’évaluation et de politique de santé, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal; Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada

2. École nationale d’administration publique, Montreal, Canada; Centre de recherche Charles-le-Moyne, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada

3. École nationale d’administration publique, Montreal, Canada; Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Recent work on health system strengthening suggests that a combination of leadership and policy capacity is essential to achieve transformation and improvement. Policy capacity and leadership are mutually constitutive but difficult to assemble in a coherent and consistent way. Our paper relies on the nested model of policy capacity to empirically explore how health reformers in seven Canadian provinces address the question of policy capacity. More specifically, we look at emerging representations of policy capacity within the context of health reforms between 1990 and 2020. Based on the exploration of the scientific and grey literature (legislation, annual reports of Ministries, agencies and organizations, meeting minutes, press, etc.) and interviews with key informants (n = 54), we identify how policy capacity is considered and framed within health reforms A series of core dilemmas emerge from attempts by each province to develop policy capacity for and through health reforms.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science

Reference50 articles.

1. Foucault, policy and rule: Challenging the problem-solving paradigm;Bacchi,2010

2. The turn to problematization: Political implications of contrasting interpretive and poststructural adaptations;Bacchi;Open Journal of Political Science,2015

3. Problematizations in health policy: Questioning how “problems” are constituted in policies;Bacchi;Sage Open,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3