Distinct and common mechanisms of cross-model semantic conflict and response conflict in an auditory relevant task

Author:

Xu Honghui123,Yang Guochun45,Göschl Florian6,Nolte Guido6,Ren Qiaoyue7,Li Zhenghan8,Wu Haiyan3,Engel Andreas K6,Li Qi9,Liu Xun12

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Psychology CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, , Beijing 100101, China

2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Department of Psychology, , Beijing 100040, China

3. University of Macau Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences and Department of Psychology, , Taipa, Macau 999078, China

4. University of Iowa Cognitive Control Collaborative, , Iowa City, IA 52242, United States

5. University of Iowa Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, , Iowa City, IA 52242, United States

6. University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, , Hamburg 20246, Germany

7. LMU General and Experimental Psychology Unit, Department of Psychology, , Munich 80802, Germany

8. Hangzhou Normal University Institute of Brain Science and Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, , Hangzhou 311121, China

9. Capital Normal University Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition, School of Psychology, , Beijing 100048, China

Abstract

Abstract The mechanisms of semantic conflict and response conflict in the Stroop task have mainly been investigated in the visual modality. However, the understanding of these mechanisms in cross-modal modalities remains limited. In this electroencephalography (EEG) study, an audiovisual 2–1 mapping Stroop task was utilized to investigate whether distinct and/or common neural mechanisms underlie cross-modal semantic conflict and response conflict. The response time data showed significant effects on both cross-modal semantic and response conflicts. Interestingly, the magnitude of semantic conflict was found to be smaller in the fast response time bins than in the slow response time bins, whereas no such difference was observed for response conflict. The EEG data demonstrated that cross-modal semantic conflict specifically increased the N450 amplitude. However, cross-modal response conflict specifically enhanced theta band power and theta phase synchronization between the medial frontal cortex (MFC) and lateral prefrontal electrodes as well as between the MFC and motor electrodes. In addition, both cross-modal semantic conflict and response conflict led to a decrease in P3 amplitude. Taken together, these findings provide cross-modal evidence for domain-specific mechanism in conflict detection and suggest both domain-specific and domain-general mechanisms exist in conflict resolution.

Funder

Key Project of Beijing Education Science Planning

National Natural Science Foundation of China

National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the German Research Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3