Test–retest reliability and time-of-day variations of perfusion imaging at rest and during a vigilance task

Author:

Guo Bowen12,Mao Tianxin12,Tao Ruiwen12,Fu Shanna12,Deng Yao12,Liu Zhihui12,Wang Mengmeng3,Wang Ruosi12,Zhao Weiwei12,Chai Ya1245,Jiang Caihong12,Rao Hengyi124567ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Research & Key Laboratory of Brain-Machine Intelligence for Information Behavior (Ministry of Education and Shanghai) , School of Business and Management, , Shanghai 201620 , China

2. Shanghai International Studies University , School of Business and Management, , Shanghai 201620 , China

3. Business School, NingboTech University , Ningbo 315199 , China

4. Center for Functional Neuroimaging , Department of Neurology, , Philadelphia, PA 19104 , United States

5. University of Pennsylvania , Department of Neurology, , Philadelphia, PA 19104 , United States

6. Unit for Experimental Psychiatry , Division of Sleep and Chronobiology, Department of Psychiatry, , Philadelphia, PA 19104 , United States

7. University of Pennsylvania , Division of Sleep and Chronobiology, Department of Psychiatry, , Philadelphia, PA 19104 , United States

Abstract

Abstract Arterial spin-labeled perfusion and blood oxygenation level–dependent functional MRI are indispensable tools for noninvasive human brain imaging in clinical and cognitive neuroscience, yet concerns persist regarding the reliability and reproducibility of functional MRI findings. The circadian rhythm is known to play a significant role in physiological and psychological responses, leading to variability in brain function at different times of the day. Despite this, test–retest reliability of brain function across different times of the day remains poorly understood. This study examined the test–retest reliability of six repeated cerebral blood flow measurements using arterial spin-labeled perfusion imaging both at resting-state and during the psychomotor vigilance test, as well as task-induced cerebral blood flow changes in a cohort of 38 healthy participants over a full day. The results demonstrated excellent test–retest reliability for absolute cerebral blood flow measurements at rest and during the psychomotor vigilance test throughout the day. However, task-induced cerebral blood flow changes exhibited poor reliability across various brain regions and networks. Furthermore, reliability declined over longer time intervals within the day, particularly during nighttime scans compared to daytime scans. These findings highlight the superior reliability of absolute cerebral blood flow compared to task-induced cerebral blood flow changes and emphasize the importance of controlling time-of-day effects to enhance the reliability and reproducibility of future brain imaging studies.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

Shanghai International Studies University Research Projects

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3