Develop and Validate a Prognostic Index With Laboratory Tests to Predict Mortality in Middle-Aged and Older Adults Using Machine Learning Models: A Prospective Cohort Study

Author:

Huang Chi-Hsien12,Fang Yao-Hwei3ORCID,Zhang Shu4ORCID,Wu I-Chien3,Chuang Shu-Chun3,Chang Hsing-Yi3ORCID,Tsai Yi-Fen3,Tseng Wei-Ting3,Wu Ray-Chin3,Liu Yen-Tze56,Lien Li-Ming7,Juan Chung-Chou8,Tange Chikako4,Otsuka Rei4,Arai Hidenori9,Hsu Chih-Cheng3,Hsiung Chao Agnes3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Family Medicine, E-Da Hospital , Kaohsiung , Taiwan

2. School of Medicine, College of Medicine, I-Shou University , Kaohsiung , Taiwan

3. Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes , Zhunan, Miaoli , Taiwan

4. Department of Epidemiology of Aging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology , Obu , Aichi , Japan

5. Big Data Center, Changhua Christian Hospital , Changhua, Changhua , Taiwan

6. Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University , Taichung , Taiwan

7. Department of Neurology, Shin Kong Memorial Wu Ho-Su Hospital , Taipei , Taiwan

8. Department of Surgery, Yuan’s General Hospital , Kaohsiung , Taiwan

9. National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology , Obu , Aichi , Japan

Abstract

Abstract Background Prognostic indices can enhance personalized predictions of health burdens. However, a simple, practical, and reproducible tool is lacking for clinical use. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prognostic index for predicting all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older individuals. Methods We utilized the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study in Taiwan (HALST) cohort, encompassing data from 5 663 participants. Over the 5-year follow-up, 447 deaths were confirmed. A machine learning-based routine blood examination prognostic index (MARBE-PI) was developed using common laboratory tests based on machine learning techniques. Participants were grouped into multiple risk categories by stratum-specific likelihood ratio analysis based on their MARBE-PI scores. The MARBE-PI was subsequently externally validated with an independent population-based cohort from Japan. Results Beyond age, sex, education level, and BMI, 6 laboratory tests (low-density lipoprotein, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase, lymphocyte count, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and creatinine) emerged as pivotal predictors via stepwise logistic regression (LR) for 5-year mortality. The area under curves of MARBE-PI constructed by LR were 0.799 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.778–0.819) and 0.756 (95% CI: 0.694–0.814) for the internal and external validation data sets, and were 0.801 (95% CI: 0.790–0.811) and 0.809 (95% CI: 0.774–0.845) for the extended 10-year mortality in both data sets, respectively. Risk categories stratified by MARBE-PI showed a consistent dose–response association with mortality. The MARBE-PI also performed comparably with indices constructed with clinical health deficits and/or laboratory results. Conclusions The MARBE-PI is considered the most applicable measure for risk stratification in busy clinical settings. It holds potential to pinpoint older individuals at elevated mortality risk, thereby aiding clinical decision-making.

Funder

National Health Research Institutes

Ministry of Science and Technology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference55 articles.

1. A combined comorbidity score predicted mortality in elderly patients better than existing scores;Gagne,2011

2. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people;Rockwood,2005

3. A standard procedure for creating a frailty index;Searle,2008

4. A frailty index derived from a standardized comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts mortality and aged residential care admission;Burn,2018

5. Development and validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older adults;Lee,2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3