Validation of a Rule-Based ICD-10-CM Algorithm to Detect Fall Injuries in Medicare Data

Author:

Ganz David A12,Esserman Denise3,Latham Nancy K4,Kane Michael3,Min Lillian C5,Gill Thomas M6ORCID,Reuben David B1,Peduzzi Peter3,Greene Erich J3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA , Los Angeles, California , USA

2. Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System , Los Angeles, California , USA

3. Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health , New Haven, Connecticut , USA

4. Boston Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Research Program in Men’s Health: Aging and Metabolism, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School , Boston, Massachusetts , USA

5. Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Center for Clinical Management Research and Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center (GRECC) , Ann Arbor, Michigan , USA

6. Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine , New Haven, Connecticut , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background Diagnosis-code-based algorithms to identify fall injuries in Medicare data are useful for ascertaining outcomes in interventional and observational studies. However, these algorithms have not been validated against a fully external reference standard, in ICD-10-CM, or in Medicare Advantage (MA) data. Methods We linked self-reported fall injuries leading to medical attention (FIMA) from the Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders (STRIDE) trial (reference standard) to Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) and MA data from 2015–19. We measured the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) based on sensitivity and specificity of a diagnosis-code-based algorithm against the reference standard for presence or absence of ≥1 FIMA within a specified window of dates, varying the window size to obtain points on the curve. We stratified results by source (FFS vs MA), trial arm (intervention vs control), and STRIDE’s 10 participating health care systems. Results Both reference standard data and Medicare data were available for 4 941 (of 5 451) participants. The reference standard and algorithm identified 2 054 and 2 067 FIMA, respectively. The algorithm had 45% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 43%–47%) and 99% specificity (95% CI: 99%–99%) to identify reference standard FIMA within the same calendar month. The AUC was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.78–0.81) and was similar by FFS or MA data source and by trial arm but showed variation among STRIDE health care systems (AUC range by health care system, 0.71 to 0.84). Conclusions An ICD-10-CM algorithm to identify fall injuries demonstrated acceptable performance against an external reference standard, in both MA and FFS data.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Institutes of Health

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

Yale Pepper Center

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3