Abstract
Abstract
Understanding social stratification and social displacement processes in cities is important to the development of social and urban policies. This chapter discusses the value of comparative urbanism and gentrification theory in explaining such processes and the theory’s ability to travel globally. A literature review of how gentrification theory has evolved and been geographically dispersed illustrates the difficulty as well as the fruitfulness of travelling theory. Using comparative methods in urban studies helps building epistemological frameworks that strengthen theory development. A shared, global research agenda of comparative urbanism can also contribute to the struggles over the right to cities. The global force of the Right to the City Movement, which can impact social policies, highlights the value of comparative urbanism and a shared research agenda on gentrification.
Publisher
Oxford University PressNew York, NY
Reference66 articles.
1. The challenge of comparative case studies.;Abu-Lughod;City,2007
2. Decommodification and the worlds of welfare revisited.;Bambra;Journal of European Social Policy,2006
3. City of superlatives.;Beauregard;City and Community,2003
4. Small cities? Towards a research agenda.;Bell;International Journal of Urban and Regional Research,2009