Affiliation:
1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology and National Bureau of Economic Research, United States
2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
Abstract
Abstract
Should policy communications aim at anchoring expectations of the policy instrument (“keep interest rates at zero until date τ”) or of the targeted outcome (“do whatever it takes to bring unemployment down to $y\%$”)? We study how the optimal approach depends on a departure from rational expectations. People have limited depth of knowledge and rationality, or form otherwise distorted beliefs about the behavior of others and the general equilibrium (GE) effects of policy. The bite of this distortion on implementability and welfare is minimized by target-based guidance if and only if GE feedback is strong enough. This offers a rationale for why central banks should shine the spotlight on unemployment when faced with a prolonged liquidity trap, a steep Keynesian cross, or a large financial accelerator.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference84 articles.
1. “Bubbles and Crashes,”;Abreu;Econometrica,2003
2. “The Better-Than-Average Effect,”;Alicke,2005
3. “The Theory of Optimal Delegation with an Application to Tariff Caps,”;Amador;Econometrica,2013
4. “Learning from Prices: Public Communication and Welfare,”;Amador;Journal of Political Economy,2010
5. “Commitment vs. Flexibility,”;Amador;Econometrica,2006
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献