Affiliation:
1. University of California, Berkeley
Abstract
Abstract
The earnings difference between white and black workers fell dramatically in the United States in the late 1960s and early 1970s. This article shows that the expansion of the minimum wage played a critical role in this decline. The 1966 Fair Labor Standards Act extended federal minimum wage coverage to agriculture, restaurants, nursing homes, and other services that were previously uncovered and where nearly a third of black workers were employed. We digitize over 1,000 hourly wage distributions from Bureau of Labor Statistics industry wage reports and use CPS microdata to investigate the effects of this reform on wages, employment, and racial inequality. Using a cross-industry difference-in-differences design, we show that earnings rose sharply for workers in the newly covered industries. The impact was nearly twice as large for black workers as for white workers. Within treated industries, the racial gap adjusted for observables fell from 25 log points prereform to 0 afterward. We can rule out significant disemployment effects for black workers. Using a bunching design, we find no aggregate effect of the reform on employment. The 1967 extension of the minimum wage can explain more than 20% of the reduction in the racial earnings and income gap during the civil rights era. Our findings shed new light on the dynamics of labor market inequality in the United States and suggest that minimum wage policy can play a critical role in reducing racial economic disparities.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference73 articles.
1. “The Minimum Wage, Restaurant Prices and Labor Market Structure;Aaronson;Journal of Human Resources,2008
2. “When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?,”;Abadie,2017
3. “Minimum Wages and Youth Employment in France and the United States,”;Abowd,2000
4. “Credible Research Designs for Minimum Wage Studies;Allegretto;ILR Review,2017
5. “The Effect of Political Power on Labor Market Inequality: Evidence from the 1965 Voting Rights Act,”;Aneja
Cited by
72 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献