Striving toward Community-Engaged and Participatory Methods: Considerations for Researchers in Academic Settings

Author:

Narendorf Sarah C1,Ali Samira2,Lea Charles H3,Pritzker Suzanne4

Affiliation:

1. University of Houston PhD, is associate professor of social work and associate dean of research and faculty development, Graduate College of Social Work, , 110 HA Social Work Building, Houston, TX 77204-4013, USA

2. University of Houston PhD, is associate professor, Graduate College of Social Work, , Houston, TX, USA

3. Columbia University PhD, is assistant professor, School of Social Work, , New York, NY, USA

4. Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston PhD, is associate professor and associate dean for academic affairs, , Houston, TX, USA

Abstract

AbstractCommunity-engaged and participatory methods are increasingly used by academic researchers. Power dynamics in academia shape the landscape in which researchers implement these methods, yet are rarely understood and intentionally addressed. Through the lens of social work researchers at different career stages, this article describes how power relations within academia present challenges to community-engaged and participatory research across four stages of the research process (participant/researcher relationship, study formulation, conducting research, and publication/dissemination). These challenges are located within four domains of power identified by intersectionality scholars: Institutional policies such as those for tenure and promotion and for research administration presented challenges with the structural domain. Decisions about how to implement and enforce policies and operationalize what counts for tenure and promotion were identified as challenges within the disciplinary domain. Norms about who belongs on a university campus and what types of research are valued exemplified the cultural domain, while dynamics about who is viewed as an expert exemplified challenges the interpersonal domain. Across the research process, the article identifies potential solutions and suggests strategies for intentional consideration by academic researchers and their institutions to conduct meaningful, inclusive, and socially just research that shares power with community.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Using research to build power: the Pittsburgh Wage study;Journal of Community Practice;2023-10-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3