When more is not better: 10 ‘don’ts’ in endometriosis management. An ETIC* position statement

Author:

,Alio L,Angioni S,Arena S,Bartiromo L,Bergamini V,Berlanda N,Bonin C,Busacca M,Candiani M,Centini G,D’Alterio M N,Di Cello A,Exacoustos C,Fedele L,Frattaruolo M P,Incandela D,Lazzeri L,Luisi S,Maiorana A,Maneschi F,Martire F,Massarotti C,Mattei A,Muzii L,Ottolina J,Perandini A,Perelli F,Pino I,Porpora M G,Raimondo D,Remorgida V,Seracchioli R,Solima E,Somigliana E,Sorrenti G,Venturella R,Vercellini P,Viganó P,Vignali M,Zullo F,Zupi EORCID

Abstract

Abstract A network of endometriosis experts from 16 Italian academic departments and teaching hospitals distributed all over the country made a critical appraisal of the available evidence and definition of 10 suggestions regarding measures to be de-implemented. Strong suggestions were made only when high-quality evidence was available. The aim was to select 10 low-value medical interventions, characterized by an unfavorable balance between potential benefits, potential harms, and costs, which should be discouraged in women with endometriosis. The following suggestions were agreed by all experts: do not suggest laparoscopy to detect and treat superficial peritoneal endometriosis in infertile women without pelvic pain symptoms; do not recommend controlled ovarian stimulation and IUI in infertile women with endometriosis at any stage; do not remove small ovarian endometriomas (diameter <4 cm) with the sole objective of improving the likelihood of conception in infertile patients scheduled for IVF; do not remove uncomplicated deep endometriotic lesions in asymptomatic women, and also in symptomatic women not seeking conception when medical treatment is effective and well tolerated; do not systematically request second-level diagnostic investigations in women with known or suspected non-subocclusive colorectal endometriosis or with symptoms responding to medical treatment; do not recommend repeated follow-up serum CA-125 (or other currently available biomarkers) measurements in women successfully using medical treatments for uncomplicated endometriosis in the absence of suspicious ovarian cysts; do not leave women undergoing surgery for ovarian endometriomas and not seeking immediate conception without post-operative long-term treatment with estrogen–progestins or progestins; do not perform laparoscopy in adolescent women (<20 years) with moderate–severe dysmenorrhea and clinically suspected early endometriosis without prior attempting to relieve symptoms with estrogen–progestins or progestins; do not prescribe drugs that cannot be used for prolonged periods of time because of safety or cost issues as first-line medical treatment, unless estrogen–progestins or progestins have been proven ineffective, not tolerated, or contraindicated; do not use robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis outside research settings. Our proposal is to better address medical and surgical approaches to endometriosis de-implementing low-value interventions, with the aim to prevent unnecessary morbidity, limit psychological distress, and reduce the burden of treatment avoiding medical overuse and allowing a more equitable distribution of healthcare resources.

Funder

Institut Biochimique SA, Lugano, Switzerland

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

Reference136 articles.

1. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) for symptomatic endometriosis following surgery;Abou-Setta;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2013

2. Endometriosis treatment Italian Club. How to manage bowel endometriosis: the ETIC approach;Alabiso;J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2015

3. Endometriosis treatment Italian Club. Adenomyosis: what the patient needs;Alabiso;J Minim Invasive Gynecol,2016

4. Menstrual suppression for adolescents;Altshuler;Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol,2014

5. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 310, April 2005. Endometriosis in adolescents;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG);Obstet Gynecol,2005

Cited by 47 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3