The ethics of preconception expanded carrier screening in patients seeking assisted reproduction

Author:

de Wert Guido1ORCID,van der Hout Sanne1ORCID,Goddijn Mariëtte2,Vassena Rita3ORCID,Frith Lucy4ORCID,Vermeulen Nathalie5ORCID,Eichenlaub-Ritter Ursula6,Blanchet Valérie,D’Angelo Arianna,de Wert Guido,Eguizabal Cristina,Eichenlaub-Ritter Ursula,Frith Lucy,Geril Annick,Goddijn Mariëtte,Heindryckx Bjorn,Mertes Heidi,Ombelet Willem,Rautakallio-Hokkanen Satu,Strowitzki Thomas,Tapanainen Juha,Tarlatzis Basil C,Van den Eede Bruno,Westin Cecilia,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health, Ethics and Society; CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University; and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands

2. Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

3. Clinica EUGIN, Carrer de Balmes 236, Barcelona 08006, Spain

4. Department of Public Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

5. ESHRE, Central office, Meerstraat 60, 1852 Grimbergen, Belgium

6. Universitat Bielefeld, Fakultat fur Biologie, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany

Abstract

ABSTRACT Expanded carrier screening (ECS) entails a screening offer for carrier status for multiple recessive disorders simultaneously and allows testing of couples or individuals regardless of ancestry or geographic origin. Although universal ECS—referring to a screening offer for the general population—has generated considerable ethical debate, little attention has been given to the ethics of preconception ECS for patients applying for assisted reproduction using their own gametes. There are several reasons why it is time for a systematic reflection on this practice. Firstly, various European fertility clinics already offer preconception ECS on a routine basis, and others are considering such a screening offer. Professionals involved in assisted reproduction have indicated a need for ethical guidance for ECS. Secondly, it is expected that patients seeking assisted reproduction will be particularly interested in preconception ECS, as they are already undertaking the physical, emotional and economic burdens of such reproduction. Thirdly, an offer of preconception ECS to patients seeking assisted reproduction raises particular ethical questions that do not arise in the context of universal ECS: the professional’s involvement in the conception implies that both parental and professional responsibilities should be taken into account. This paper reflects on and provides ethical guidance for a responsible implementation of preconception ECS to patients seeking assisted reproduction using their own gametes by assessing the proportionality of such a screening offer: do the possible benefits clearly outweigh the possible harms and disadvantages? If so, for what kinds of disorders and under what conditions?

Funder

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3