ESHRE PGT Consortium data collection XIX–XX: PGT analyses from 2016 to 2017

Author:

van Montfoort A1ORCID,Carvalho F23,Coonen E4,Kokkali G5,Moutou C6,Rubio C7,Goossens V8ORCID,De Rycke M9

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

2. Genetics—Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

3. i3s—Instituto de Investigacao e Inovacao em Saude, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

4. Departments of Clinical Genetics and Obstetrics & Gynaecology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

5. Reproductive Medicine Unit, Genesis Athens Clinic, Chalandri, Athens, Greece

6. Laboratoire de Diagnostic préimplantatoire, Université de Strasbourg, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, CMCO, Schiltigheim, France

7. PGT-A Research, Igenomix, Valencia, Spain

8. ESHRE Central Office, Grimbergen, Belgium

9. Centre for Medical Genetics, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What are the trends and developments in pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) in 2016–2017 as compared to previous years? SUMMARY ANSWER The main trends observed in this 19th and 20th data set on PGT are that trophectoderm biopsy has become the main biopsy stage for PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and that the implementation of comprehensive testing technologies is the most advanced with PGT-A. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Since it was established in 1997, the ESHRE PGT Consortium has been collecting and analysing data from mainly European PGT centres. To date, 18 data sets and an overview of the first 10 years of data collections have been published. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The data for PGT analyses performed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017 with a 2-year follow-up after analysis were provided by participating centres on a voluntary basis. Data were collected using a new online platform, which is based on genetic analysis as opposed to the former cycle-based format. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Data on biopsy method, diagnostic technology and clinical outcome were submitted by 61 centres. Records with analyses for more than one PGT for monogenic/single gene defects (PGT-M) and/or PGT for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) indication or with inconsistent data regarding the PGT modality were excluded. All transfers performed within 2 years after the analysis were included enabling the calculation of cumulative pregnancy rates. Data analysis, calculations, figures and tables were made by expert co-authors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The current data collection from 2016 to 2017 covers a total of 3098 analyses for PGT-M, 1018 analyses for PGT-SR, 4033 analyses for PGT-A and 654 analyses for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A. The application of blastocyst biopsy is gradually rising for PGT-M (from 8–12% in 2013–2015 to 19% in 2016–2017), is status quo for PGT-R (from 22–36% in 2013–2015 to 30% in 2016–2017) and has become the preferential biopsy stage for PGT-A (from 23–36% in 2013–2015 to 87% in 2016–2017). For concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A, biopsy was primarily performed at the blastocyst stage (93%). The use of comprehensive diagnostic technology showed a similar trend with a small increased use for PGT-M (from 9–12% in 2013–2015 to 15% in 2016–2017) and a status quo for PGT-SR (from 36–58% in 2013–2015 to 50% in 2016–2017). Comprehensive testing was the main technology for PGT-A (from 66–75% in 2013–2015 to 93% in 2016–2017) and for concurrent PGT-M/SR with PGT-A (93%). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The findings apply to the data submitted by 61 participating centres and do not represent worldwide trends in PGT. Details on the health of babies born were not provided in this manuscript. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Being the largest data collection on PGT in Europe/worldwide, the data sets provide a valuable resource for following trends in PGT practice. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The study has no external funding and all costs are covered by ESHRE. There are no competing interests declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Funder

European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3