Responsible innovation in human germline gene editing. Background document to the recommendations of ESHG and ESHRE†‡

Author:

de Wert Guido1,Heindryckx Björn2,Pennings Guido3,Clarke Angus4,Eichenlaub-Ritter Ursula5,van El Carla G6,Forzano Francesca7,Goddijn Mariëtte8,Howard Heidi C9,Radojkovic Dragica10,Rial-Sebbag Emmanuelle11,Dondorp Wybo1,Tarlatzis Basil C12,Cornel Martina C6,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Research Institutes GROW and CAPHRI, Fac. of Health, Medicine and the Life Sciences, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, The Netherlands

2. Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent-Fertility and Stem cell Team (G-FaST), Ghent University Hospital, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Gent, Belgium

3. Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

4. Institute of Medical Genetics, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, Wales, UK

5. Institute of Gene Technology/Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bielefeld, Postfach 10 01 31, Bielefeld D-33501 Germany

6. Department of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

7. Clinical Genetics Department, Guy’s Hospital, 7th Floor Borough Wing, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK

8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

9. Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics; Uppsala University, Box564, SE-751 22 Uppsala, Sweden

10. Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Institute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, PO Box 23, 11010 Belgrade, Serbia

11. Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, UMR 1027, Inserm, Université de Toulouse—Université Paul Sabatier—Toulouse III, Allées Jules Guesdes 37, 31073 Toulouse Cedex, France

12. 1st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 9 Agias Sofias Str., 546 23 Thessaloniki, Greece

Abstract

Abstract Technological developments in gene editing raise high expectations for clinical applications, including editing of the germline. The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society of Human Genetics (ESHG) together developed a Background document and Recommendations to inform and stimulate ongoing societal debates. This document provides the background to the Recommendations. Germline gene editing is currently not allowed in many countries. This makes clinical applications in these countries impossible now, even if germline gene editing would become safe and effective. What were the arguments behind this legislation, and are they still convincing? If a technique could help to avoid serious genetic disorders, in a safe and effective way, would this be a reason to reconsider earlier standpoints? This Background document summarizes the scientific developments and expectations regarding germline gene editing, legal regulations at the European level, and ethics for three different settings (basic research, pre-clinical research and clinical applications). In ethical terms, we argue that the deontological objections (e.g. gene editing goes against nature) do not seem convincing while consequentialist objections (e.g. safety for the children thus conceived and following generations) require research, not all of which is allowed in the current legal situation in European countries. Development of this Background document and Recommendations reflects the responsibility to help society understand and debate the full range of possible implications of the new technologies, and to contribute to regulations that are adapted to the dynamics of the field while taking account of ethical considerations and societal concerns.

Funder

ESHRE

ESHG

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Environmental Engineering

Reference112 articles.

1. Human gene therapy: why draw a line?;Anderson;J Med Philos,1989

2. Protecting the endangered human: toward an international treaty prohibiting cloning and inheritable alterations;Annas;Am J Law Med,2002

3. International regulatory landscape and integration of corrective genome editing into in vitro fertilization;Araki;Reprod Biol Endocrinol,2014

4. Specific elimination of mutant mitochondrial genomes in patient-derived cells by mitoTALENs;Bacman;Nat Med,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3