Author:
Bing-Canar Hanaan,Khan Humza,Stocks Jane K,Lapitan-Moore Franchezka,Phillips Matthew S,Rauch Andrew,Obolsky Max,Cerny Brian M,Soble Jason R,Jennette Kyle J,Resch Zachary J
Abstract
Abstract
Objective: Increasing evidence suggests that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) predict neurocognitive dysfunction, possibly through direct (e.g., brain structure/function changes) and indirect (e.g., increased psychopathology risk) pathways. However, extant studies have focused on young and older adults, with limited understanding as to how ACEs affect cognitive health in mid-adulthood. Therefore, this study compared adults with high vs. low ACE scores on measures of cognitive performance and psychopathology.
Method: This cross-sectional study included 211 adult patients (46.9% female; Mage = 44.9, SD = 17.1; Meducation = 13.8, SD = 3.0) consecutively referred for outpatient neuropsychological evaluation within a large, Midwestern academic medical center. A series one-way analysis of variances (ANOVAs) were conducted to compare high vs. low ACE groups on the Test of Premorbid Functioning (TOPF), Digit Span (DS), Trail Making Test-Part B (TMT-B), Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT; Immediate and Long Delayed Recall), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) scores.
Results: Significant group differences were detected for BDI-II and BAI scores, F(1,159) = 18.38, p.05. Non-significant cognitive measure findings cannot be attributed to group differences in premorbid functioning, as TOPF score also did not significantly differ by ACE group, p > 0.05.
Conclusions: Results of this investigation suggest that greater ACEs increase risk of depression and anxiety, but not neurocognitive dysfunction, in adulthood.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,General Medicine
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献