Cognitive Profile and Relationship with Quality of Life and Psychosocial Functioning in Mood Disorders

Author:

Zazula Robson12,Mohebbi Mohammadreza34,Dodd Seetal35,Dean Olivia M36,Berk Michael3567,Vargas Heber Odebrecht2,Nunes Sandra Odebrecht Vargas2

Affiliation:

1. Federal University for Latin American Integration, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil

2. Londrina State University, Health Sciences Graduate Program, Londrina, Brazil

3. Deakin University, iMPACT, the Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Barwon Health, Geelong, Australia

4. Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

6. Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

7. Orygen, the National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health and the Centre of Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Comparisons between healthy controls (HCs) and individuals with mood disorders have shown more cognitive dysfunction among the latter group, in particular in bipolar disorder (BD). This study aimed to characterize the pattern of cognitive function of BD and major depressive disorder (MDD) and compare them to HC using the (CogState Research Battery) CSRB™. Method Participants were tested, comprising the following domains: processing speed, attention, working memory, visual memory, executive functions, and verbal memory. Quality of life and functionality were also assessed. Multiple linear regression models were performed to examine the effect of demographic characteristics and functionality on cognitive outcomes separately for BD and MDD. Results Ninety individuals participated in the study, of which 32 had BD, 30 had MDD, and 28 were HC. Differences were found between both BD and MDD and HC for the composite cognitive score, with significant differences between BD and HC (Diff = −5.5, 95% CI = [−9.5, −1.5], p = 0.005), and MDD and HC (Diff = −4.6, 95% CI = [−8.6, −0.5], p = 0.025). There were overall significant differences in five cognitive domains: processing speed (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004), attention (p = 0.002), working memory (p = 0.02), visual memory (p = 0.021), and verbal memory (p = 0.007). BD also presented worse performance than both MDD and HC, and MDD presented better performance than BD but worse than HC in quality of life and functionality. Multiple linear regression models were significative for education (p < 0.001) and age (p = 0.004) for BD and education (p < 0.001) for MDD. Conclusion In general, cognition is more affected in BD than MDD, which could be associated with functional and quality of life impairment.

Funder

Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3