Normative Data for Derived Measures and Discrepancy Scores for the Uniform Data Set 3.0 Neuropsychological Battery

Author:

Devora Paulina V1,Beevers Samantha2,Kiselica Andrew M1,Benge Jared F134

Affiliation:

1. Division of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurology, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX 76508, USA

2. Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, Temple, TX 76508, USA

3. Texas A&M Health Science Center, Temple, TX 76508, USA

4. Plummer Movement Disorders Center, Temple, TX 76508, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective The Uniform Data Set 3.0 (UDS 3.0) neuropsychological battery is a recently published battery intended for clinical research with older adult populations. While normative data for the core measures has been published, several additional discrepancy and derived scores can also be calculated. We present normative data for Trail Making Test (TMT) A & B discrepancy and ratio scores, semantic and phonemic fluency discrepancy scores, Craft Story percent retention score, Benson Figure percent retention score, difference between verbal and visual percent retention, and an error index. Method Cross-Sectional data from 1803 English speaking, cognitively normal control participants were obtained from the NACC central data repository. Results Descriptive information for derived indices is presented. Demographic variables, most commonly age, demonstrated small but significant associations with the measures. Regression values were used to create a normative calculator, made available in a downloadable supplement. Statistically abnormal values (i.e., raw scores corresponding to the 5th, 10th, 90th, and 95th percentiles) were calculated to assist in practical application of normative findings to individual cases. Preliminary validity of the indices are demonstrated by a case study and group comparisons between a sample of individuals with Alzheimer's (N = 81) and Dementia with Lewy Bodies (DLB; N = 100). Conclusions Clinically useful normative data of such derived indices from the UDS 3.0 neuropsychological battery are presented to help researchers and clinicians interpret these scores, accounting for demographic factors. Preliminary validity data is presented as well along with limitations and future directions.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,General Medicine

Reference57 articles.

1. Role of frontal versus temporal cortex in verbal fluency as revealed by voxel-based lesion symptom mapping;Baldo;Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,2006

2. Survey results regarding use of the Boston naming test: Houston, we have a problem;Bortnik;Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,2013

3. Diagnostic utility of abbreviated fluency measures in Alzheimer disease and vascular dementia;Canning;Neurology,2004

4. Diagnostic accuracy of percent retention scores on RBANS verbal memory subtests for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment;Clark;Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology,2010

5. Verbal fluency in children: Developmental issues and differential validity in distinguishing children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and two subtypes of dyslexia;Cohen;Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3