Brief Report: An Evaluation of Item Bias on the Functional Activities Questionnaire

Author:

González David Andrés123ORCID,Clark Michael J4,Gonzales Mitzi M12,Benge Jared56ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio , San Antonio, TX 78229 , USA

2. Glenn Biggs Institute for Alzheimer’s and Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio , San Antonio, TX 78229 , USA

3. Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL 60612 , USA

4. Predictive Analytics Teams, Strong Analytics , Chicago, IL 60611 , USA

5. Department of Neurology , Dell Medical School, , Austin, TX 78712 , USA

6. University of Texas at Austin , Dell Medical School, , Austin, TX 78712 , USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective To evaluate whether the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), a commonly used measure of functional status in neurodegenerative disease research, performs equivalently across demographically diverse subgroups of participants. Method The FAQs from 30,613 National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center participants were evaluated with a hybrid graded response model-logistic ordinal regression approach to determine the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) within five demographic groups: education, ethnicity, race, language, and sex. Results Measurable DIF was observed for FAQ items in all groups; however, measures of effect size, latent trait distributions, and item characteristic curves suggested that the impact was minimal for research and practice. Conclusions The FAQ is able to provide minimally biased assessments of daily functioning across diverse participants, suggesting potential value for offsetting disparities in diagnosis and treatment.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,General Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. 2021 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures;Alzheimer’s Association;Alzheimer's & Dementia,2021

2. Perspectives on ethnic and racial disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: Update and areas of immediate need;Babulal;Alzheimer's & Dementia,2019

3. Version 3 of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set;Besser;Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders,2018

4. Lordif: An R package for detecting differential item functioning using iterative hybrid ordinal logistic regression/item response theory and Monte Carlo simulations;Choi;Journal of Statistical Software,2011

5. A systematic review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of dementia in non-western, low-educated or illiterate populations;Franzen;Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society,2020

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3