Test–Retest Reliability and Reliable Change on the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery

Abstract

Abstract Objective Researchers and practitioners can detect cognitive improvement or decline within a single examinee by applying a reliable change methodology. This study examined reliable change through test–retest data from the English-language National Institutes of Health Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) normative sample. Method Participants included adults (n = 138; age: M ± SD = 54.8 ± 20.0, range: 18–85; 51.4% men; 68.1% White) who completed test–retest assessments about a week apart on five fluid cognition tests, providing raw scores, age-adjusted standard scores (SS), and demographic-adjusted T-scores (T). Results The Fluid Cognition Composite (SS: ICC = 0.87; T-score: ICC = 0.84) and the five fluid cognition tests had good test–retest reliability (SS: ICC range = 0.66–0.85; T-score: ICC range = 0.64–0.86). The lower and upper bounds of 70%, 80%, and 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated around change scores, which serve as cutoffs for determining reliable change. Using T-scores, 90% CI, and adjustment for practice effects, 32.3% declined on one or more tests, 9.7% declined on two or more tests, 36.6% improved on one or more tests, and 5.4% improved on two or more tests. Conclusions It was common for participants to show reliable change on at least one test score, but not two or more test scores. Per an 80% CI, test–retest difference scores beyond these cutoffs would indicate reliable change: Dimensional Change Card Sort (SS ≥ 14/T ≥ 10), Flanker (SS ≥ 12/T ≥ 8), List Sorting (SS ≥ 14/T ≥ 10), Picture Sequence Memory (SS ≥ 19/T ≥ 13), Pattern Comparison (SS ≥ 11/T ≥ 8), and Fluid Cognition Composite (SS ≥ 10/T ≥ 7). The reliable change cutoffs could be applied in research or practice to detect within-person change in fluid cognition at the individual level.