Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Italian Normative Data for Older Adults

Author:

Chipi Elena12,Fruttini Daniela34,Salvadori Nicola12,Montanucci Chiara12,Siena Elisa12,Menculini Giulia54,Mazzeschi Claudia67,Parnetti Lucilla12

Affiliation:

1. Center for Memory Disturbances , Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, , Perugia , Italy

2. University of Perugia , Section of Neurology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, , Perugia , Italy

3. Section of Endocrinology and Metabolism , Department of Medicine and Surgery, , Perugia , Italy

4. University of Perugia , Department of Medicine and Surgery, , Perugia , Italy

5. Section of Psychiatry , Department of Medicine and Surgery, , Perugia , Italy

6. Department of Philosophy , Social & Human Sciences and Education, , Perugia , Italy

7. University of Perugia , Social & Human Sciences and Education, , Perugia , Italy

Abstract

Abstract Objective The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), widely used for detecting cognitive impairment in different neuropsychiatric conditions, is increasingly applied for measuring cognitive functioning in older individuals. Available normative data for RBANS Italian version suffer from under-representation of the older ages (>60 years) and are not corrected for education. Moreover, normative data are provided only for Indexes and Total scores. We thus administered RBANS Italian version in a larger sample of older adults, taking into account the effect of age, education and gender on all scores. Method We used a regression-based model to assess the effect of age, education, and gender on RBANS Subtests, Indexes and Total scores in a consecutive series of healthy cognitively normal volunteers aged 60–79 years (N = 158). The obtained norms were compared with the Italian original normative data by means of Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results Multiple linear regression analyses showed that age and educational level significantly influence performances on most RBANS scores. A free-to-use Excel to calculate subject’s percentiles for any single score was developed. When compared with original normative values, our percentiles distribution of Indexes and Total scores did not reveal significant differences (p > .05). Conclusion The obtained normative data show good concordance with previous norms. The instrument seems not significantly affected by educational level. The possibility to correct for any single score could make RBANS a more precise measure for capturing subtle cognitive deficits in prevention studies.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology,General Medicine

Reference26 articles.

1. RBANS norms based on the relationship of age, gender, education, and WRAT-3 reading to performance within an older African American sample;Andreotti;The Clinical Neuropsychologist,2015

2. RBANS analysis of verbal memory in multiple sclerosis;Beatty;Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology,2004

3. Analyzing the subcortical dementia syndrome of Parkinson’s disease using the RBANS;Beatty;Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology,2003

4. The Italian version of cognitive function instrument (CFI): Reliability and validity in a cohort of healthy elderly;Chipi;Neurological Sciences,2018

5. Biomarker-based signature of Alzheimer’s disease in pre-MCI individuals;Chipi;Brain Sciences,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3