Antibiotic appropriateness and guideline adherence in hospitalized children: results of a nationwide study

Author:

McMullan Brendan J123ORCID,Hall Lisa4,James Rodney5,Mostaghim Mona6,Jones Cheryl A789,Konecny Pamela1011,Blyth Christopher C7891213,Thursky Karin A514

Affiliation:

1. National Centre for Infections in Cancer, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

2. Department of Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia

3. School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

4. School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

5. National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia

6. Department of Pharmacy, Sydney Children’s Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, Australia

7. Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

8. Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia

9. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

10. Department of Infectious Diseases, Immunology & Sexual Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia

11. St George and Sutherland Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

12. School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

13. Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia

14. Department of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Information on the nature and appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for children in hospitals is important, but scarce. Objectives To analyse antimicrobial prescribing and appropriateness, and guideline adherence, in hospitalized children across Australia. Patients and methods We analysed data from the National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (NAPS) from 2014 to 2017. Surveys were performed in hospital facilities of all types (public and private; major city, regional and remote). Participants were admitted children <18 years old. Risk factors associated with inappropriate prescribing were explored using logistic regression models. Results Among 6219 prescriptions for 3715 children in 253 facilities, 19.6% of prescriptions were deemed inappropriate. Risk factors for inappropriate prescribing included non-tertiary paediatric hospital admission [OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.20–1.55)] and non-major city hospital location [OR 1.52 (95% CI 1.30–1.77)]. Prescriptions for neonates, immunocompromised children and those admitted to an ICU were less frequently inappropriate. If a restricted antimicrobial was prescribed and not approved, the prescription was more likely to be inappropriate [OR 12.9 (95% CI 8.4–19.8)]. Surgical prophylaxis was inappropriate in 59% of prescriptions. Conclusions Inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing in children was linked to specific risk factors identified here, presenting opportunities for targeted interventions to improve prescribing. This information, using a NAPS dataset, allows for analysis of antimicrobial prescribing among different groups of hospitalized children. Further exploration of barriers to appropriate prescribing and facilitators of best practice in this population is recommended.

Funder

University of Melbourne

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care

National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey

Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Australia

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Microbiology (medical)

Reference33 articles.

1. Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients;Davey;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

2. Potentially inappropriate prescribing in children;Barry;Fam Pract,2015

3. Sharing Antimicrobial Reports for Pediatric Stewardship (SHARPS): a quality improvement collaborative;Newland;J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3