Exploring the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing for common respiratory tract infections in UK primary care

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To use illness severity scores to evaluate the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in UK general practice. Methods We describe variations in practice prescribing rates, taking account of illness severity. We used three scores in three studies to measure severity: ‘FeverPAIN’ in an adult acute sore throat cohort (n = 12 829), the ‘3C score’ in an adult acute lower respiratory tract infection cohort (n = 28 883) and the STARWAVe score in an acute cough and respiratory infection children’s cohort (n = 8394). We calculated median ORs to quantify practice-level variation in prescribing rates, adjusted for illness severity. Results There was substantial variability in practice prescribing rates (ranges of 0%–97%, 7%–100% and 0%–75% in the three cohorts, respectively). There was evidence that higher prescribing practices saw a higher proportion of unwell patients. At the individual level, patients who were more unwell were more likely to receive a prescription, but prescribing levels for those with low scores were still high. The median OR was 2.5 (95% credible interval = 2.2–2.9) in the sore throat data set, 2.9 (95% credible interval = 2.6–3.2) in the adult cough data set and 2.1 (95% credible interval = 1.8–2.4) in the children’s cough data set. Conclusions Higher prescribing practices may see more unwell patients with high illness severity scores, but the differences in scores account for a minority of between-practice prescribing variation. There is likely to be scope for further reductions in antibiotic prescribing among patients with low illness severity scores. Further research is needed to explore the additional factors that account for variation in prescribing levels.