Author:
Dessaux Pierre-Antoine,Mazaud Jean-Philippe
Abstract
This article addresses the issue of the uses of the multidivisional form in the French context at the end of the 1960s and the beginning of the 1970s. Comparing two case studies, Danone and Hachette, it sheds light on specific experiences in two different industries, the food and the book industry, respectively, in order to contribute to the debate over the Chandlerian paradigm. These two cases show that the implementation of the M-form in European companies can neither be reduced to the necessary diffusion of a universal structure nor to managerial fashion. At first a matter of redistributing the power between the shareholders and the management, the M-form led to hybrid organizations with characteristics heavily dependent on intensive internal negotiations. These findings emphasize the potential diversity of the implementation of the M-form and of the relations between management and shareholders. Far from being linear, company trajectories then heavily depend on partial compromises.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference45 articles.
1. Chandler, Alfred D. , Jr. “The Enduring Logic of Industrial Success.” Harvard Business Review 68 (March–April 1990): 434–44.
2. Rapport de la Commission des Industries Agro-alimentaires du IVe Plan. Paris, 1961.
3. Thanheiser, Heinz T. The Strategy and Structure of German Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, Mass., 1972.
4. Cailluet, Ludovic. “McKinsey, Total-CFP et la M-form. Un exemple français d’adaptation d’un modèle d’organisation importé.” Entreprises et histoire 25 (Oct. 2000): 26–45.
5. Meuleau, Marc. “Les HEC et l’évolution du management en France (1881–années 1980).” Ph.D. diss., Université Paris X-Nanterre, 1992.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献