Interventions to tackle health inequalities in cardiovascular risks for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations: a rapid review

Author:

Fu Yu1ORCID,Yu Ge2,Maulana Naswa3,Thomson Katie45

Affiliation:

1. Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool , 1-3 Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GL , UK

2. King’s Health Economics, Health Services and Population Research, Department of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London , David Goldberg Centre 18 De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF , UK

3. Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road , Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX , UK

4. Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building , Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX , UK

5. National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration, North East and North Cumbria, Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust St Nicholas Hospital Gosforth , Newcastle Upon Tyne NE3 3XT , UK

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has shown significant health inequalities for people with low socioeconomic status associated with more risk factors. This review was to synthesize interventions that targeted CVD risks and outcomes among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations and to understand the impact associated with these interventions. Sources of data Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched for records published in the last decade using a systematic search strategy, complemented by screening the reference lists and citation indexes. Nineteen studies were included and a narrative synthesis with the effect direction plot was undertaken in which studies, interventions, participants and outcomes were examined according to the intervention type focusing on behaviours, lifestyle, education, medication and monitoring. Areas of agreement No universal definition of disadvantaged socioeconomic status was used with common factors relating to racial/ethnic minorities, low income and low or no health insurance. Mixed effects of interventions were reported on clinical outcomes including weight, body mass index, blood pressure, glycated haemoglobin and cholesterol. Areas of controversy Inconsistent effect was reported due to a large variety of settings, participants and intervention components although they are considered necessary to address the complex health needs of socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Growing points There is inadequate evidence to determine whether any of the intervention types are effective in optimising lipids management for socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Areas timely for developing research Research is needed with mixed evidence using real world evaluation and lived experience combined with health economic evaluation, on both mental and physical health outcomes.

Funder

National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) [Applied Research Collaboration North East and North Cumbria

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3