Affiliation:
1. Department of Criminology and Faculty of Law, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
2. Policy Studies, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
Abstract
Abstract
In 2019, Canada introduced legislative changes that made asylum seekers ineligible for protection if they have made a previous refugee claim in a country that Canada shares an information-sharing agreement with. Such agreements are currently in place with the US, Australia, the UK, and New Zealand. This article offers a critical assessment of the new ineligibility ground, arguing that the policy is designed to deter secondary refugee movements, particularly those across the Canada–US border which have considerably intensified since 2017. Based on the ‘first safe country’ rule, the new ineligibility ground enables Canada to exclude some asylum seekers from refugee protection without offering any alternative effective protection in Canada. This article demonstrates that the policy is inconsistent with Canada’s obligations under international refugee law.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference77 articles.
1. Bordering on Failure: Canada-U.S. Border Policy and the Politics of Refugee Exclusion;ARBEL;Harvard Immigration and Refugee Law Clinical Program & Harvard Law School,2013
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献