Affiliation:
1. Melbourne Social Equity Institute, University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
Abstract
Abstract
This paper examines how the ‘ideal’ refugee is conceptualized in discussions about Australia’s humanitarian policies. Critical Discourse Analysis of semi-structured interviews with 24 Western Australians revealed strong themes of assimilation alongside the neoliberal concept of ‘market citizenship’, where the ‘ideal’ refugee is positioned as achieving economic success through contributions to Australia’s labour market. These discourses served competing ends—they were voiced both in support of, and opposition to, Australia’s acceptance of refugees. I argue that by constructing refugees’ deservingness of protection along market citizenship lines, their belonging becomes contingent upon their adherence to a narrowly defined ideal. Consequently, refugees who do not fit within this ideal face continued exclusion, with their ‘human capital’ prioritized over their safety and human rights. This article calls for a reconsideration of arguments that focus on refugees’ capacity to ‘fit in’ and ‘give back’ as these narratives may exacerbate their experiences of exclusion and stigmatization.
Funder
Australian Government Research Training Program
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference97 articles.
1. Positive Attitudes towards Asylum Seekers;ANDERSON;Australian Journal of Psychology,2015
2. The Racial Economies of Criminalization, Immigration, and Policing in Italy;ANGEL-AJANI;Social Justice,2003
3. Framing Asylum Seekers: The Uses of National and Cosmopolitan Identity Frames in Arguments about Asylum Seekers;AUSTIN;Identities,2018
4. New Values, Race and “the Hanson Debate” in Australian Media;BELL;Asia Pacific Media Educator,1997
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献