Examining efforts to predict day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC): a systematic review protocol

Author:

Sardesai Thomas1ORCID,Hobbs Laura23,Phillips Caroline4,Bashford Tom23,Kohler Katharina23,Stubbs Daniel5

Affiliation:

1. University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine , Box 111 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ , UK

2. International Health Systems , Department of Engineering & Division of Anaesthesia, , Cambridge , UK

3. University of Cambridge , Department of Engineering & Division of Anaesthesia, , Cambridge , UK

4. Department of Anaesthetics, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge, CB2 0QQ , UK

5. Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital , Hills Road, Cambridge , UK

Abstract

Abstract Day-of-surgery cancellation (DOSC) in elective surgery occurs in roughly 18% of elective surgeries worldwide. This impacts patient physical health, psychological wellbeing and social function. Further impacts include reduced health service efficiency and wider economic productivity. There is a range of contributing variables including patient factors, resource constraints and health service pressures which could be integrated into predictive models. This article describes the protocol for a systematic review to evaluate peer-reviewed original research articles and implementation studies of models to predict DOSC. Such statistical models could, if properly integrated into clinical practice, yield benefits to patients and healthcare providers. The systematic review will provide a comprehensive synthesis of evidence in this area to inform future efforts at gold-standard statistical modelling. Predictor-finding studies, subsequent publications of the same model and publications in which the predictive variables have not been disclosed will be excluded. Searches will be conducted in Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of science. Risk of bias will be assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. Data will be collected on included variables, method of prediction, whether prediction was made at the level of the patient or the system, and training and assessment processes. These data will be subject to qualitative synthesis and used to generate a narrative summary and figures. This systematic review will abide by the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. This review is registered on PROSPERO, registration CRD42023478984.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3