Protocol for a systematic review of the management and outcomes in patients with gallbladder agenesis

Author:

Young Erin N1,Dongho Ghyslaine B D2ORCID,Ngo Ngo Valery2,Asahngwa Constantine2,Jasmin Hilary M3,Nelson John S4,Zalamea Nia N456,Gobina Ronald M278,Foretia Denis A2456ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center , Memphis, TN , USA

2. Division of Health Policy and Research, Nkafu Policy Institute , Yaoundé , Cameroon

3. Health Sciences Library, University of Tennessee Health Science Center , Memphis, TN , USA

4. Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center , Memphis, TN , USA

5. Center for Multicultural and Global Health, University of Tennessee Health Science Center , Memphis, TN , USA

6. Global Surgery Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center , Memphis, TN , USA

7. Department of Nephrology, Buea Regional Hospital , Buea , Cameroon

8. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea , Buea , Cameroon

Abstract

Abstract Gallbladder agenesis (GA) is a congenital anomaly of the biliary system, with characteristic absence of the gallbladder and cystic duct often with variable clinical presentation. Despite major advances in imaging technology many patients undergo unnecessary operative interventions during which the diagnosis is made. Very little is known on the management and outcomes in this patient population. Therefore, the main objective of this study protocol is to guide a comprehensive review of published cases of GA to evaluate and synthesize research findings on its presentation, management and clinical outcomes. This systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. MEDLINE, via PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Google Scholar will be searched for articles on GA in humans (case report and case series) published before 1 October 2022 in English, French and Spanish. Two independent investigators will review each article, determine if it meets inclusion criteria, extract data and assess the study quality. A third investigator will arbitrate studies where there are conflicts between the first two investigators. Short and long-term outcomes will be compared between cases that underwent non-operative versus open versus laparoscopic surgery. Estimates will be made of odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3