Metabarcoding of stomach contents and fecal samples provide similar insights about Seaside Sparrow diet

Author:

Snider Allison M1ORCID,Bonisoli-Alquati Andrea2ORCID,Pérez-Umphrey Anna A1ORCID,Stouffer Philip C1ORCID,Taylor Sabrina S1

Affiliation:

1. School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University and Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA

2. Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University – Pomona, Pomona, California, USA

Abstract

Abstract DNA metabarcoding is a popular tool for animal diet studies to address a variety of research topics across disciplines and taxa. Despite its widespread use, there has been relatively little focus on how digestion influences prey DNA detection and the description of a predator’s diet. Fecal samples are a compelling source of dietary DNA because they are collected non-invasively. However, these samples may provide incomplete or inaccurate descriptions of diet because of differential digestion and DNA degradation across prey taxa during gut passage. This is especially pertinent for avian diet studies, which have widely adopted the use of fecal samples as a proxy for overall diet. To explore how digestion affects the recovery and detection of prey DNA in passerines, we used DNA metabarcoding to compare the recovery of prey DNA from paired stomach contents and fecal samples in Seaside Sparrows (Ammospiza maritima). Stomach contents produced ~2.5 times greater DNA concentrations than fecal samples and—while this difference in DNA concentration was not statistically significant—stomach contents produced significantly more read identifications than fecal samples. However, these differences did not influence the description of diet, as similar measures of richness and diversity were found in both sample types. The relative read abundance of common prey families remained consistent between sample types, suggesting that while less DNA may survive digestion, the proportions of prey remain largely unaffected. We found no difference in the description of diet based on sample type at the population level, but our results show that comparing stomach and fecal samples from the same individual can reveal distinct foraging bouts. With no clear benefit to using stomach contents, we conclude that fecal samples are the preferred sample type for avian metabarcoding diet studies, unless research goals necessitate otherwise.

Funder

Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

U.S. Department of Agriculture

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3