Optimizing the Care and Management of Older Offenders: A Scoping Review

Author:

Hagos Amanuel K1,Butler Tony G1,Howie Adam2,Withall Adrienne L1

Affiliation:

1. School of Population Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

2. Justice Health and Forensic Mental Health Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives The rapid increase in the number of older offenders in many countries presents unique challenges to both correctional and health care systems. In the absence of strong empirical evidence on effective interventions, identifying best practices can help optimize the care and management of this segment of the prisoner population. Research Design and Methods We conducted a scoping review of care models, prison programs, and different interventions designed to improve the care and management of older offenders. We searched 5 bibliographic databases and other data sources including OpenGrey, agency documents, and government reports published until December 2020. This review employed commonly used steps for conducting a scoping review and applied additional tools to enhance the methodology. Results After title and abstract screening and full-text review, a total of 34 studies were included in the analysis. Four themes emerged from the review: (a) institutional logics, (b) adaptations, (c) multidisciplinary teams, and (d) person-centered care and management. Discussion and Implications Best practices identified in this review can help optimize the care and management of older offenders in mainstream prisons. Further action research is recommended to adapt and scale up the interventions.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference54 articles.

1. Golden years behind bars: Special programs and facilities for elderly inmates;Aday;Federal Probation,1994

2. Older and geriatric offenders: Critical issues for the 21st century;Aday,2013

3. Spurring tensions at work and the moderating role of psychological resilience;Ahmed;Academy of Management Proceedings,2020

4. Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework;Arksey;International Journal of Social Research Methodology,2005

5. Achieving rigor in literature reviews: Insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support;Bandara;Communications of the Association for Information Systems,2015

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3