Human Flourishing and Integrated Care Models: The Development of the Flourish Index

Author:

Faul Anna C123,D’Ambrosio Joseph G14,Yankeelov Pamela A12,Cotton Samantha G1,Furman Christian D14,Hall-Faul Madri5,Gordon Barbara5,Wright R Brent4

Affiliation:

1. Institute for Sustainable Health and Optimal Aging, University of Louisville, Kentucky

2. Kent School of Social Work, University of Louisville, Kentucky

3. Department of Social Work, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

4. School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Kentucky

5. Kentuckiana Regional Planning and Development Agency, Area Agency on Aging, Louisville, Kentucky

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives In evaluating integrated care models, traditional quality measures do not account for functional and quality of life factors, affecting older adults with multiple chronic conditions. The objective of this study was the development and validation of the Flourish Index (FI), an instrument to evaluate integrated care, using a determinants of health model. Research Design and Methods The study took place within the evaluation study of the Flourish Model (FM). The FM provides care coordination services using an integrated primary care and community-based services model. Baseline data from 70 older adults were used in the validation study. Twenty-seven quality of care indicators within six determinants of health, namely biological, psychological, individual health behaviors, health services, environmental, and social, formed part of the FI. Results Categorical principal components analysis showed a 5-dimensional structure with psychological determinants loading on the biological determinants of health. Internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) for the determinants was as follows: biological/psychological = 0.73, individual = 0.58, environmental = 0.62, health services = 0.65, social = 0.67, total score = 0.97. Sensitivity to change was shown for the total FI score (F1,22 = 8.82, p = .01) and social (F1,22 = 5.82, p = .02), with a trend toward sensitivity for individual health behaviors (F1,22 = 3.95, p = .06) and health services (F1,22 = 3.26, p = .09). Discussion and Implications The preliminary analysis of the FI shows promise for the usability of the index to provide insight into the fundamental challenges of aging. It brings greater clarity in caring for older adults and supports quality evaluation of integrated care coordination models.

Funder

Health Resources and Services Administration

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference60 articles.

1. Factors influencing older adults to complete advance directives;Alano;Palliative and Supportive Care,2010

2. Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation;Baltes,1990

3. Conjoint screening questionnaires for alcohol and other drug abuse: Criterion validity in a primary care practice;Brown;Wisconsin Medical Journal,1995

4. Preparing patients and caregivers to participate in care delivered across settings: The care transitions intervention;Coleman;Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,2004

5. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health;Commission on Social Determinants of Health,2008

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3