Implementing the Care of Persons With Dementia in Their Environments (COPE) Intervention in Community-Based Programs: Acceptability and Perceived Benefit From Care Managers’ and Interventionists’ Perspectives

Author:

Kellett Kathy1,Robison Julie1,McAbee-Sevick Heather1,Gitlin Laura N2,Verrier Piersol Catherine3,Fortinsky Richard H1

Affiliation:

1. UConn Center on Aging, University of Connecticut, School of Medicine , Farmington, Connecticut , USA

2. College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

3. Department of Occupational Therapy, Thomas Jefferson University , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives Nonpharmacologic interventions have demonstrated benefits for people living with dementia and their caregivers. Few studies have evaluated their implementation in real-world settings. Using normalization process theory (NPT), an implementation science framework, this study evaluated the acceptability of the care of persons with dementia in their environments (COPE) intervention by care managers and interventionists implemented in a Medicaid and state-revenue funded home and community-based services (HCBS) program. Research Design and Methods NPT and data from 9 care manager focus groups (n = 61) and 2 interventionist focus groups (n = 8) were utilized to understand COPE acceptability to program care managers and interventionists. NPT’s 4 criteria, coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring, framed the research questions used to evaluate the intervention’s implementation. Results Care managers and interventionists demonstrated a shared understanding of COPE aims and the value of practices implemented (coherence). Training by national experts facilitated program buy-in to meet COPE goals and was demonstrated by care managers and interventionists as they used the training to broaden their program involvement (cognitive participation). Operational work done by care managers and interventionists to implement the intervention (collective action) and their shared perceptions of program benefits (reflexive monitoring) contributed to program implementation, families’ positive responses to COPE and enhanced sustainability. Discussion and Implications Introducing evidence-based dementia care interventions into HCBS programs strongly depends upon building shared understandings between care managers and interventionists and valuing the contributions of all stakeholders involved in delivering care innovations to people living with dementia and their caregivers.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Gerontology,General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures;Alzheimer’s Association;Alzheimers Dementia,2020

2. Multi-crossover randomized controlled trial designs in Alzheimer’s Disease;Arnold;Annals of Neurology,2018

3. Response biases in marketing research;Baumgartner,2006

4. Occupational therapy for people with dementia and their family carers provided at home: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Bennett;British Medical Journal,2019

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3