Performance of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index in a Sample of Black and White Persons Living With Dementia and Their Caregivers

Author:

Pereira-Osorio Carolina1ORCID,Brickell Emily1,Lee Bern1,Arredondo Beth1,Sawyer Robert John1

Affiliation:

1. Ochsner Health, Center for Brain Health , New Orleans, Louisiana , USA

Abstract

Abstract Background and Objectives This study examined the performance of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index (MCSI) in a sample of Black and White caregivers of persons living with dementia. Research Design and Methods Data on 153 dyads enrolled in the Care Ecosystem dementia care management program were analyzed, including sociodemographic variables, dementia severity, and caregiver burden and wellbeing. Factor structure, item-response patterns, and concurrent validity were assessed across racial groups. Results Differences between Black and White caregivers included gender, dyad relation, and socioeconomic disadvantage. Factor structure and item loadings varied by racial cohort, with parameters supporting a 3-factor model. For Black caregivers, finances and work, emotional and physical strain, and family and personal adjustment items loaded together on individual factors. For White caregivers physical and emotional strain items loaded on separate factors, although personal and family adjustment items loaded with work and financial strain items. Item-level analysis revealed differences between groups, with Black caregivers endorsing physical strain to a greater degree (p = .003). Total MCSI scores were positively correlated with concurrent measures like the PHQ-9 (White: r = 0.67, Black: r = 0.54) and the GAD-2 (White: r = 0.47, Black: r = 0.4), and negatively correlated with self-efficacy ratings (White: r = −0.54, Black: r = −0.55), with a p < .001 for all validity analysis. Discussion and Implications The MCSI displayed acceptable statistical performance for Black and White caregivers of persons living with dementia and displayed a factor structure sensitive to cultural variations of the construct. Researchers results highlight the inherent complexity and the relevance of selecting inclusive measures to appropriately serve diverse populations.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Reference48 articles.

1. Racial differences in caregiving: Variation by relationship type and dementia care status;Badana;Journal of Aging and Health,2019

2. The Zarit Burden Interview: A new short version and screening version;Bédard;The Gerontologist,2001

3. The impact of informal caregiving for older adults on the health of various types of caregivers: A systematic review;Bom;The Gerontologist,2019

4. Missing the mark: The complexity of African American dementia family caregiving;Brewster;Journal of Family Nursing,2020

5. Validation of the Chinese version of the Modified Caregivers Strain Index among Hong Kong caregivers: An initiative of medical social workers;Chan;Health & Social Work,2013

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3